Supplier social and environmental performance

Strengthened and resilient value chain in its most vulnerable parts, composed of suppliers who make use of responsible social and environmental practices to ensure good practices throughout the productive life cycle.

KODS 2030

100% of critical suppliers included in the Sustainable Supply Chain Management Program

 

 

2020 2021 2022 2023  2030 Goal
43% 56% 70% 83.1% 100%
 
 

The 2020 baseline (KODS release date) considers around 13.5% of critical suppliers covered per year, since the first phase of the Supply Chain Social and Environmental Responsibility Program began in 2019. The criteria that define a supplier as critical are: value of Klabin's revenue (spend), representativeness in the business areas (Forestry, Pulp and Paper and Packaging), recurrence greater than six times (in different months of the year).

For more information on the program, method and results, please refer to Supplier social and environmental performance management

Klabin’s supply chain profile

The suppliers are classified as providers of forestry inputs, commodities and specialty chemicals for pulp and paper production; fuel, power and packaging for finished products; provision of logistics services, material management, equipment storage and rental; supply of auxiliary production material, uniforms and Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), bearings, pumps; provision of cleaning, security and maintenance services, among other positions. This sample does not consider international purchases (Imports and Klabin Argentina).

The raw materials that make up Klabin's products are 98% sourced from renewable sources (wood for processing, purchased wood chips, and purchased pulp), and 2% from non-renewable sources (sulfuric acid, sodium sulfate, aluminum sulfate, lime, and kaolin).

 Supplier screening program

Supplier Screening

 2023  2022
Total number of Tier-1 suppliers  7.858 7.528
Total number of significant suppliers in Tier-1  393 88
Percentage of total spend on significant suppliers in Tier-1  66% 6%
Total number of significant suppliers in non Tier-1  0 0
Total number of significant suppliers (Tier-1 and non Tier-1) 393 88

 

Supplier assessment program 

Supplier Assessment

2023 2022
Percentage of significant suppliers assessed 88% 91%
Total number of suppliers assessed via desk assessments/ on-site assessments  393 88
Number of suppliers assessed with substantial actual/ potential negative impacts  131 31
Percentage of suppliers with substantial actual/potential negative impacts with agreed corrective action/improvement plan  33% 35%
Number of suppliers with substantial actual/potential negative impacts that were terminated  0 0
Target 100% 90%

 

Suppliers are evaluated based on four strategic pillars: Environment, Labor and Human Rights, Ethics, and Sustainable Procurement. Suppliers with negative impacts are those who scored between 0 and 34 points in the assessment, indicating a risk. All suppliers scored unsatisfactorily in two or more pillars, with 96% performing poorly in Ethics, 94% in Environment, 67% in Sustainable Procurement, and 53% in Labor Practices and Human Rights.

Suppliers demonstrating significant impacts undergo an action plan, accounting for 33% of those evaluated. Among them, 3% have active action plans, while the remaining 30% have been reassessed and do not pose a high risk.

Suppliers with corrective action plans  

Corrective action plan support 2023 2022
Total number of suppliers supported in corrective action plan implementation 115 31
Percentage of suppliers assessed with substantial actual/potential negative impacts supported in corrective action plan implementation 29% 35%
Target for percentage of significant suppliers in corrective action plan implementation 100% 100%

 

Suppliers in capacity building programs 

Capacity building programs 2023 2022
Total number of suppliers in capacity building programs 115 88
Percentage of significant suppliers in capacity building programs 29% 69%
Target of percentage of significant suppliers in capacity building programs 100% 100%

 


Number of active suppliers by region and total expenditures made

  Unit 2023 2022 2021 2020 Var. % (22/23)
North Number 289 262 267 196 10.31
Northeast Number 978 896 832 646 9.15
Midwest Number 194 180 184 51 7.70
Southeast Number 2,193 2,094 2,043 3,782 4.73
South Number 4,204 4,096 3,993 3,176 2.64
Total active suppliers Number 7,858 7,528 7,319 7,851 4.38
Total amount spent on suppliers Millions of BRL 9,001 7,281 6,061 4.2 23.62

 

GRI-204-1

Percentage of purchases from local suppliers

State 2023 2022 2021 2020
Amazonas 64.00% 59.74% 59.97% 71.4%
Bahia 54.00% 58.37% 36.23% 37.8%
Ceará 54.00% 50.02% 30.49% NA
Goiás 52.00% 60.69% 41.52% NA
Minas Gerais 53.00% 56.09% 37.80% 55.5%
Paraná 67.00% 62.62% 61.30% 66.8%
Pernambuco 49.00% 45.86% 35.18% 37.4%
Santa Catarina 58.00% 56.29% 41.08% 58.3%
São Paulo 78.00% 85.50% 82.27% 78.1%
Rio Grande do Sul 46.00% 58.46% 43.19% 60.0%
Average 66.00% 63.1% 46.9% 64.7%
  1. Local suppliers are those based in the same state as Klabin's operations (headquarters and subsidiary). 
  2. The percentage of purchases from local suppliers considers the total spend of monitored suppliers (excluding imports, Klabin Argentina, and Klabin's itself). 
  3. The variations are due to commercial negotiations and differentials in price and volume conditions. 

GRI-308-1GRI-414-1

Percentage of new suppliers selected based on social and environmental* criteria​

 

  2023 2022 2021 2020
Number of new suppliers 61 73 103 136
Number of new suppliers selected based on social criteria 61 73 103 136
Percentage of suppliers selected based on social criteria 100% 100% 100% 100%

*The number of suppliers reported represents critical suppliers that participate in our Supply Chain Corporate Social Responsibility program. The 4 topics covered in our program are: Environment, Ethics, Labor Relations and Human Rights, and Corporate Purchasing.

The suppliers, within the total reported here, participated in the Corporate Social Responsibility in the Supply Chain program for the first time in 2023. This program assesses the following topics: the environment, ethics, human rights, and sustainable purchasing. 

GRI-308-2GRI-414-2

Evaluation of social and environmental impacts on the supply chain​

  2023 2022 2021 2020
Number of suppliers assessed regarding social impacts 91 88 94 84
Number of suppliers identified as causing actual and potential negative social impacts 23 31 24 10
Percentage of suppliers identified as causing actual and potential negative social impacts, with which improvement agreements were signed as a result of the assessment conducted 25% 35% 26% 12%

In the 5th year of the Corporate Social Responsibility program in the Supply Chain, three evaluation actions were conducted (two reevaluations and one evaluation of newly selected suppliers) using the EcoVadis methodology. A total of 95 suppliers were invited and 91 were evaluated, with a participation rate of 96% at the end of the cycle.

In addition to the ESG criteria applied in the supplier selection and screening stage, the evaluation process includes verification stages conducted by Klabin's internal staff and by auditing companies hired to ensure that business partners comply with the company's requirements.  

 

Supplier Evaluation 

Type of Evaluation  Description  Indicators  Corrective or Improvement Action Plans 
Supplier document evaluations  The supplier approval process includes a documentary analysis and adherence to our general supply terms encompassing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) aspects. Document verification occurs regularly and may generate action plans for the regularization of already approved suppliers. 
  • Compliance with labor laws and regulations 
  • Deviations that require monitoring 
  • Suspended suppliers 
In case of non-compliance, the supplier must execute a corrective action plan as soon as possible. Otherwise, Klabin may take measures such as payment suspension and even disable the supplier. 
On-site supplier evaluations (second-party evaluation)  Actions are carried out through the chain of custody (CoC) process for wood suppliers. A rigorous system of internal audits ensures compliance through field and documentary checks following FSC principles. Additionally, technical guidance is offered, encouraging the certification of the properties involved.  The audits generate action plans that may involve improvements or corrections. 
On-site supplier evaluations (third-party evaluation).  The Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) program has had a significant positive impact on the wood production chain. Third-party evaluated wood acquired is FSC certified, meaning it follows sustainable management principles. Learn more at: https://fsc.org/en 
  • % of wood acquired certified by third-party 
For certification, it is necessary to demonstrate compliance and progress with FSC principles, thus generating action plans related to the audit process. 
Supplier evaluations using standards and methodologies from a multi-sectoral initiative. The Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) is a global non-profit organization with a multi-stakeholder approach to sustainable forest management. Its structure incorporates an equal division of votes between three distinct chambers: environmental, social, and economic. This ensures that all decisions reflect a balance of interests among different stakeholders, including environmental, social organizations, indigenous communities, the forest business sector, and academics. The FSC methodology establishes international standards to be followed for an operation to be certified, which may include chain of custody verification, ensuring certified products are separated from non-certified ones throughout the supply chain. 
  • % of certified units 
  • % of certified wood suppliers 
  • % of certified wood purchased 
  • More information at Forest Certification
Certification processes result in action plans that must be implemented, and continuous improvement leads to certification being maintained year after year. 

 

 

Supplier Development 

 

Initiative  Description  Indicators 
Supplier information/training on the ESG program for suppliers, processes, and requirements  ECOVADIS: through the Ecovadis Academy, various courses and materials on ESG practices are used both for training the company's internal teams and for training and guiding suppliers on Klabin's ESG practices. 
  • Scoring of critical suppliers  
  • Participation in training
MATAS LEGAIS, PLANTE COM A KLABIN, AND CERTIFICATION OF WOOD SUPPLIERS: promote technical training on production practices, management, and awareness of more efficient, fair production in line with Klabin's and international ESG practices, such as FSC principles. More information at Forest Certification and Matas Legais
  • Properties served 
  • Hectares restored 
  • Donated seedlings 
  • Certified wood suppliers and producers 
CLIMATE COMMITMENT LETTER: suppliers receive online training through the Klabin Knowledge Trail, an educational program focused on climate change and emission management 
  • Participation in training 
  • Relevant suppliers from an emission perspective 
  • Improvement in climate change reporting via Ecovadis 
Supplier access to ESG benchmarks compared to peers  In all the programs mentioned above, participants are ranked and grouped according to their performance, which also reflects in the action plans to be developed. 
  • Scoring group by Ecovadis methodology 
  • FSC-certified wood suppliers 
  • % of controlled wood purchased 
Supplier support (remote/on-site) in implementing corrective/improvement actions  KLABIN KNOWLEDGE TRAIL: remotely, suppliers participate in an educational program focused on climate change practices and emission management
  • Increased maturity in the climate change theme via Ecovadis 
MATAS LEGAIS, PLANTE COM A KLABIN, AND CERTIFICATION OF WOOD SUPPLIERS: promote local technical training on production practices, management, and awareness of more efficient, fair production in line with Klabin's and international ESG practices, such as FSC principles. More information at Forest Certification and Matas Legais
  • Certified wood suppliers and producers 
  • Certified wood producers
Extensive technical support programs to develop ESG capacity and performance in suppliers  MATAS LEGAIS, PLANTE COM A KLABIN, AND CERTIFICATION OF WOOD SUPPLIERS: programs aimed at rural properties in Klabin's area of influence and/or suppliers, aimed at improving producers' practices and raising awareness of more efficient, fair production in line with Klabin's ESG practices and international practices, such as the FSC principles. More information at Forest Certification and Matas Legais.
  • Certified wood suppliers and producers 
  • Certified wood producers
KLABIN KNOWLEDGE TRAIL: remotely, suppliers participate in an educational program focused on climate change practices and emission management
  • Maturity on climate change via Ecovadis 

Klabin's supplier management is segmented between industrial and forestry activities. Considering the specificities of both activities, the Company has defined separate material topics (KODS) to address the respective supply chains. 

In the case of timber supply, management and performance on the topic can be observed in the KODS for Forest Certification, with a focus on the FSC® certification process, support for the development of producers to meet ESG aspects (Matas Legais Program), monitoring and traceability activities, as well as fostering initiatives (Plante com a Klabin). 

Klabin's performance, associated with supplier management as a whole, KPIs, and commitments made with the respective KODS, are continuously monitored by the Executive Board and the Sustainability Committee, composed of the Company's board of directors. 

Anchored in the KODS for Suppliers' Socio-Environmental Performance, Klabin's Sustainable Supply Chain Management Program aims to ensure that suppliers implement and follow good social and environmental practices and ensure the proper management of potential risks present in their activities, as established in Klabin's General Supply Conditions and Socio-Environmental Guidelines for Suppliers.

In 2023, the Supplier Code of Conduct and the Engagement Policy were developed under the Corporate Social Responsibility Program. Both are subject to approval for publication in 2024. 

ESG criteria in supplier selection and screening 

During the procurement process, suppliers are instructed to confirm compliance with the general supply conditions, which include ESG aspects that must be fulfilled during the execution of contracted services. Non-compliance with these requirements is prohibitive for the continuation of service provision until the supplier regularizes its situation. 

Contracts with suppliers are established through a screening and approval process, which involves evaluating aspects such as occupational health and safety, legal, commercial, technical, environmental responsibility, and financial factors. These contracts also include specific clauses for protecting labor rights, such as the prohibition of child and forced labor, child sexual exploitation on the roads, and environmental protection, among others. 

Suppliers of products and services undergo procedures for submitting documents attesting to their compliance with labor legislation and payment of social contributions and labor obligations, which may include inspections (second-party audits). These inspections include an inspection of labor documentation and workplaces in order to audit possible non-conformities. The procedure seeks the effectiveness of the conditions established for those hired directly by the Company, with employees physically present at Klabin's units or at another location determined by the company. 

The documentation related to the labor area can be monitored at the supplier's own facilities to enable more detailed analysis. In the event of any irregularities, the contracting area and the Supply department are responsible for taking action, which includes written notification to the supplier regarding rectification, suspension of payment until rectification of the detected issue, and affirmation that recurrence will lead to disqualification as a Klabin supplier. The disqualified company can only be rehired after a period of two years has elapsed since the contract was terminated. In the event of further irregularities during the term of the new agreement, the supplier is definitively disqualified.

In strategic procurement processes, such as those involving the criticality of supply, financial volume and production impacts, Klabin adopts methodologies to gather information for the technical and commercial qualification of suppliers. One of these methods is the RFI (Request for Information) process, in which a variety of information is requested, including socio-environmental criteria (such as environmental management programs, supplier evaluation criteria, training in environmental issues, etc.), operational information and registration data (such as billing, customers, units, etc.). This information is analyzed, and suppliers that demonstrate superior socio-environmental performance can become more prominent during the final selection process for supply, in addition to the evaluation of technical and commercial aspects.

Risks considered in the supplier screening process 

The company purchases approximately 40% of the wood used in its production process. To mitigate risks, the Company seeks suppliers with whom it enters into contracts for the purchase and sale of standing timber or wood to be delivered to its industrial units, as well as spot purchases.

The price conditions of wood are subject to market fluctuations and competition with other crops (such as soybeans, sugarcane, and others) in the different regions where Klabin operates. This can lead to price increases and impact the availability of wood, adversely affecting the supply to its factories, production costs, and financial results. The Company relies on the supply of inputs, raw materials, and services for its operations. Increases in input prices can raise production costs and reduce profitability

 

Definition of Critical supplier 

The criteria defining a supplier as critical are: the value of sales to Klabin (spend), representation in business units (Forestry, Pulp and Paper, and Packaging), recurrence more than six times (in different months of the year). 

Assessment and development of significant suppliers 

The supply chain management is carried out using the EcoVadis methodology, which evaluates Environmental, Labor and Human Rights, Ethics, and Sustainable Purchasing criteria for critical suppliers.  

Within the methodology, which scores suppliers from 0 to 100, the following criteria are considered: company size, country context, type of the product and potential for positive or negative visibility through external assessments. Assessment levels demonstrate suppliers’ maturity, as follows: 

  • 0 to 20 points: high risk. 
  • 20 to 35 points: medium risk. 
  • 36 to 55 points: engaged companies. 
  • 56 to 75 points: advanced companies. 
  • Over 75 points: reference companies. 

The effort in relationship-building with each level of suppliers is greater for those scoring below 35 points, through support and development of this group, based on follow-ups of their action plans by Klabin's Supply area, across the four pillars covered by the platform, thereby increasing their level of engagement. That way, it is possible to increase the evaluation criteria based on the performance of this supplier over a medium to long-term period. The selected suppliers participating in the evaluation are those considered critical. 

Critical suppliers that do not adhere to the evaluation process are analyzed by a committee that includes the areas of Technical Management, Purchasing Management directly related to the supplier, Sustainability Management, Excellence and Innovation Management in Supply Chain, Risk Management, and Integrity Management. The analysis considers aspects associated with non-substitution and productive impact (critical materials and services).  

Since 2019, critical suppliers have been evaluated using this methodology, beginning with the first wave, when 110 suppliers were invited and resulted in 86 being evaluated, with a participation rate of 78% at the end of the process. Klabin's goal is to cover 100% of them by 2030. 

In 2023, the 5th wave of evaluation was conducted with 64 invited suppliers, 61 evaluated (a participation rate of 95%), and 30 suppliers re-evaluated – from previous years – with 15 at medium risk level (between 20 and 35 points) and 15 at the "engaged" level (between 36 and 55 points). Evaluation topics included: Environment, Labor and Human Rights, Ethics and Sustainable Procurement. 

On average, 13.5% of significant suppliers are evaluated each year, totaling 83.1% in 2023. Among them, all those who scored below the expected average have action plans monitored annually and receive program support for implementing the indicated improvements. 

Internal training on ESG practices for suppliers 


To promote the improvement of critical suppliers' performance in socio-environmental assessment, the EcoVadis platform provides an online training environment (EcoVadis Academy) that guides the creation and development of management practices aligned with the assessed criteria.

Furthermore, as part of Klabin's Climate Transition Plan, the Company has begun to raise awareness in the supply chain by providing training and capacity-building for suppliers with lower maturity levels in carbon emissions management. 

Updated and verified on: 07/04/2024